<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rejuvenating the Spirit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/</link>
	<description>A Voice from the Upper Midwest, by William Ostrem</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 18:16:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard in Saint Paul</title>
		<link>http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/comment-page-1/#comment-11532</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard in Saint Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 08:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/#comment-11532</guid>
		<description>Bill, if more Americans had your thoughtfulness, the discourse would improve!

Despite my Voltairean dislike for religion in the public sphere, I must pay credit to thinkers who connect faith to the task of improving life on earth for others: the liberation theologists, for example, or the environmentalists you praise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, if more Americans had your thoughtfulness, the discourse would improve!</p>
<p>Despite my Voltairean dislike for religion in the public sphere, I must pay credit to thinkers who connect faith to the task of improving life on earth for others: the liberation theologists, for example, or the environmentalists you praise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Martin</title>
		<link>http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/comment-page-1/#comment-11150</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 02:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/#comment-11150</guid>
		<description>Have to say that generally I&#039;m not big on theology - really found much of this tedious in div school. But  I found much of Paul Tillich&#039;s work helpful and enlivening.

My basic problem with thelogians is that, imo, they often get so carried away with words and logic that what they&#039;re saying can take me further from real religious experience. To me, Tillich&#039;s concepts are often much more &quot;grounded in being,&quot; so to speak...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to say that generally I&#8217;m not big on theology &#8211; really found much of this tedious in div school. But  I found much of Paul Tillich&#8217;s work helpful and enlivening.</p>
<p>My basic problem with thelogians is that, imo, they often get so carried away with words and logic that what they&#8217;re saying can take me further from real religious experience. To me, Tillich&#8217;s concepts are often much more &#8220;grounded in being,&#8221; so to speak&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bill</title>
		<link>http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/comment-page-1/#comment-11009</link>
		<dc:creator>bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 12:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://williamostrem.net/nl/2007/02/23/rejuvenating-the-spirit/#comment-11009</guid>
		<description>John Cock emailed me this comment:

&quot;One point you might consider: &quot;postmodern&quot; is a school of philosophical thought that is not apt for me and the theologians. It is not an historical adjective, meaning after the modern era; so I would suggest if you use the word, don&#039;t use quote marks and do hyphenate it: post-modern. I would rather use the word &quot;contemporary.&quot; Don&#039;t think this is too picky.&quot;

As a result, I&#039;ve changed references to the word &quot;postmodern&quot; to &quot;contemporary.&quot; John also requested that I refer to him as a retired rather than a former Methodist minister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Cock emailed me this comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;One point you might consider: &#8220;postmodern&#8221; is a school of philosophical thought that is not apt for me and the theologians. It is not an historical adjective, meaning after the modern era; so I would suggest if you use the word, don&#8217;t use quote marks and do hyphenate it: post-modern. I would rather use the word &#8220;contemporary.&#8221; Don&#8217;t think this is too picky.&#8221;</p>
<p>As a result, I&#8217;ve changed references to the word &#8220;postmodern&#8221; to &#8220;contemporary.&#8221; John also requested that I refer to him as a retired rather than a former Methodist minister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
